Bipartisan Cohen-Lummis Bill to Increase Government Transparency Passes House
[WASHINGTON, DC] – Legislation introduced by Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-09) and Congressman Cynthia Lummis (WY-AL) to increase government transparency, the Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act, passed the House of Representatives. Congress originally enacted the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) as a means to help individuals, retirees, veterans, and small businesses recover attorney’s fees and costs associated with suing or defending against the federal government, but in 1995 removed important reporting requirements. This legislation, H.R. 2919, would reinstate the law’s tracking and reporting requirements of payments awarded to help ensure the American people have access to this important information. Video of Congressman Cohen speaking in support of the bill is available here, while Congressman Lummis’ remarks are available here.
“Americans have a right to know what their government is doing and their government has a duty to be as transparent as possible,” said Rep. Cohen. “Without adequate reporting, citizens’ rights cannot be fully protected and the government risks failing in its duty to its people. I am glad our bipartisan Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act passed the House and I appreciate all of Representative Lummis’s work to reopen the government’s books and help ensure that all Americans have access to this information.”
“The Equal Access to Justice Act was a good idea when it passed Congress more than three decades ago,” said Rep. Lummis. “It remains a good idea today so long as it is operating as Congress intended. Requiring agencies to keep track of what they pay attorneys will help Congress determine if EAJA is working well, or not. I appreciate Rep. Cohen’s work in this effort, and I am very pleased to see this bill pass the House.”
EAJA, initially passed in 1980, is funded by a permanent appropriation. Payments of attorney’s fees and costs occur regardless of any annual spending decisions made by Congress. To maintain its oversight responsibilities, Congress included a requirement that agencies and the Department of Justice issue annual reports on the amount of money paid out under the law. Congress ended those tracking and reporting requirements in 1995, but the Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act would reinstate them.
The Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act would require every federal agency to begin tracking EAJA payments again, and tasks the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) with compiling that data. ACUS is also required to submit an annual report to Congress, and to establish an online searchable database that will allow the public access to how much has been paid from EAJA, from which agencies, and to whom taxpayer dollars are being paid.
Background on the Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act
- In 1980 Congress passed the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) as a means to help individuals, retirees, veterans, and small businesses recover attorney’s fees and costs associated with suing or defending against the federal government. Congress intended EAJA to remove a barrier to justice for those with limited access to the resources it takes to sue or defend against the federal government.
- The EAJA established two methods by which individuals or groups could recover the costs of suing the federal government.
- The first method is through agency proceedings, codified under Title 5, Section 504 of U.S. Code. It provides payments for adjudicatory proceedings within the agency themselves, as opposed to courts proceedings.
- The EAJA required the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) to track these payments and report on them to Congress.
- In 1994, Congress defunded ACUS without transferring the responsibility of tracking EAJA payments to another agency.
- The EAJA required the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) to track these payments and report on them to Congress.
- The second method to recover EAJA fees is through court proceedings, codified in Title 28, Section 2412(d) of U.S. Code.
- The EAJA directed the Department of Justice to track these payments and report them to Congress.
In 1994, The Paperwork Reduction Act eliminated the DOJ’s tracking and reporting responsibility for EAJA payments.
- The first method is through agency proceedings, codified under Title 5, Section 504 of U.S. Code. It provides payments for adjudicatory proceedings within the agency themselves, as opposed to courts proceedings.